Should I rewrite this introduction and include a second--at least, for me--more exciting, high-energy draft in this book? Why should I? The purpose of the book is not to compare the differences between what I believe to be 'good' and 'bad' writing, or bland and highly rhythmic, perhaps punk, prose in print for students, nor is the purpose to illustrate what I personally or in conjunction with my colleagues consider in general to be 'good' or 'bad' writing for print. Should I place a better draft of this introduction on the website for this book instead of here in the book? Why?, so that it can sit there and, in the eyes of people who are familiar with and sensitive to appreciating the genre(s) of the WWW, just look worse, or look like an unsuccessful fish out of water? I have the rest of the book to write in print. Why double up here, when I can double up this introduction by way of the very medium I am attempting to invite you to learn and to use?


. . .